“ There ’s anawful good deal of hooplaabout that iPhone antenna . ” Why yes , there is . And while there ’s much to criticize about Apple ’s response , we ’re glad to see they ’ve turn back dissemble the problem does n’t be .
Apple drop most of the time last calendar week defending the iPhone 4 ’s antenna , using both information and rhetoric that was telling in its cathode-ray oscilloscope .
Defense No. 1: Life Sucks
Apple ’s primary defense is that every phone ’s reception imbibe when you hold it . The company linefrom the very beginning : “ Gripping any mobile earphone will result in some attenuation of its feeler performance , with certain places being worse than others depending on the placement of the aerial . This is a fact of spirit for every wireless earpiece . ”
https://gizmodo.com/apple-acknowledges-iphone-4-reception-issues-says-dont-5572279
Apple prove this “ fact of life”using three non - iPhones in particular : the BlackBerry Bold 9700 , HTC Droid Eris and Samsung ’s Omnia 2 . The earphone are end gripped ; the bars plump .
It ’s true , you could pronto demonstrate attenuation on a raft of phones . Just the fistful of phones at my office , where I have average insurance coverage , show that . Gripping the Nexus One on the bottom make a bar to overleap ; the BlackBerry Bold 9700 drops three bars , exactly as demoed by Apple ; neither the Droid X nor the Evo drop any bars bear with a normal death . ( You have to hold the very top of the Droid X or Evo to knock off a cake . ) The iPhone 4 , upgraded to 4.0.1 , touch in the individual weak spot , drops 2 bars .
The difference is that the other phones , with the elision of the Nexus One , need a grip — your hand has to wrap around where the antenna is located to cause obtrusive fading , while touching the iPhone 4 at a single gunpoint disrupts the signaling . ( AsRIM and Nokiawere flying to respond when Apple singled them out . )
https://gizmodo.com/rim-and-nokia-respond-to-apples-antennagate-press-confe-5589639
Which is exactly whatRyan Block askedApple ’s Bob Mansfield about at the post - conference Q&A :
Q : How does touching the corner with a unmarried finger seem to stimulate this payoff ? It ’s not just a grip , it can just happen by touching a single fingerbreadth .
A : Your body is a fairly in effect signal absorber . When you make contact with that telephone , its performance in contact with you is less than its freespace performance . It ’s a way to attenuate the signal by some amount .
Then why would case , which you wrap your handwriting around , be a work solvent to the job ? As an locomotive engineer told us , the fact that bumpers are the solution show that the real job has to do with peel contact with the iPhone 4 ’s antenna — not attenuation simply from signals passing through your body . Rather , he suggests , it seems like the feeler ’s impedance is changing as a result of the cutis contact , so it ’s potential that a sparse electrically non - conductive finish could solve the problem . ( Perhaps this is why Steve promised to re - valuate the offspring in September . ) That ’s why the other phones do n’t have a signal passing from attenuation that ’s quite as profound .
It ’s also why Steve Jobs offer his own “ pet hypothesis ” : that not enough case have been sold for the iPhone 4 . That seems a short silly , as the iPhone 3 gee and 3GS did n’t have a individual washy point , feign by skin impinging .
Defense 2: Everything Is Just Great
The iPhone 4 is using “ a very advanced novel antenna system . ” In fact , Steve says it “ is a more advanced antenna than ever has send on a smartphone before . ” And , by and by he state , “ looking at the datum , we do n’t think we have a trouble . ” What data is that ?
Well , they’vespent $ 100 millionon a very fancy facility with 17 different antenna depiction chamber to test phones .
Only 0.55 percentage of all iPhone 4 users have call AppleCare about the aerial or receipt . ( Thisincludes Genius Bar visits , apparently . ) That ’s around 16,500 complaint , out of 3 million iPhones sold . “ Historically for us , this is not a large number , ” Steve says . ( What is a large identification number then ? A normal number ? He does not say . )
For comparison , HTC says that theDroid Eris — one of the earphone Apple used to show that attenuation turnkey every phone — has fielded reception or antenna complaint from just 0.016 percent of all users . ( It ’s potential that it ’s grueling to find oneself where to complain about the Eris . ) Oh , and the return charge per unit for the iPhone 4 is just 1.7 percent , versus 6 percentage for the iPhone 3GS . Happy camper !
https://gizmodo.com/droid-eris-review-5401220
But then there ’s this : “ I can tell you since we ’re being wholly transparent , that even though we believe the iPhone 4 antenna is superior to that of the iPhone 3GS , I must cover to you that the iPhone 4 drop more call per 100 than iPhone 3GS . ” The rate of iPhone 4 dropped calls is less than 1 additional dropped call per 100 than the iPhone 3GS .
That routine is fuzzier than it seems , too . commute that to a portion , less than 1 additional pct could be anywhere from .01 percent to .99 percent . presumptively , Steve would use the smallest numeral potential — something like less than one one-half of one percent . So let ’s round up to one percentage . Adding another percent to 100,000 dropped calls is an extra 1,000 dropped calls . Or , put a more damning way , and flipping back to the path Steve framed it , if the iPhone 3GS dropped 1 out of every 100 calls , the iPhone 4 could neglect up to 1.9 out of every 100 calls — it ’s possible we ’re talk a nearly double dropped call rate .
Still , it ’s a fairly curious matter . Should n’t the iPhone 4 ’s “ very innovative antenna ” result in fewer dropped calls , not more , peculiarly if it ’s superior ?
Defense 3: We Made a Little Mistake, We’re Being Exploited, But Now Everything Is Fixed
If you want to roil it all down , Steve say , “ The heart and soul of the problem is : Smartphones have weak spots . We made ours super visible . Some took reward of that to show it . It was very easy incontrovertible . We make out up on displaying too many streak and made that demonstration more theatrical than it needed to be . ”
Apple says they ’ve been incorrectly display the bars , so they ’ve fixed it . “ We shaft up on our algorithm … Our choice is to put the correct algorithm in , which we ’ve just done . ” It ’s true , they have correct a substantial issue , asAnandtech attractively shows . The iPhone ’s signal bar paint a much rosier picture of the signal situation than world , and the compressed dynamic range of the Browning automatic rifle made them only slightly more precise than cream your finger and sticking it in the flatus . They ’re now far more meaningful and equally dish out indicators of signal than they ’ve been for the last two age . But why did n’t orchard apple tree do this sooner , if it was so terribly wrong ?
Well , earlier it made the iPhone ’s response look better , that ’s why . It adulterate credulity to top-notch - spandex levels to think it slipped by Apple ’s engineers for years , undetected . ( After all , they ’re establish the most modern antennas in any smartphone , with $ 100 million testing facility . They did n’t notice the iPhone used a juiced signal indicator?)The flipsideof pumping the bar , what came back to bite Apple , was that the signal drops looked worse than they in reality were .
https://gizmodo.com/why-apples-iphone-4-update-wont-fix-your-reception-prob-5577812
That ’s why you ’ll never get a unbowed - up excuse from Apple . They ’re bright enough to have a go at it that would launch the threshold to a class action courting and too proud to shed themselves on their sword over a exclusive irritating - if - small-scale issuing . It ’s just not their style and never will be while Jobs is in mission .
Defense 4: It’s a Little Problem
See all those numbers ? It ’s a niggling trouble . We work firmly . We love you . We make great stuff and nonsense . We ’re giving out free cases . Stop sing about this . Steve say , “ We ’ve been work really , really gruelling for the last 22 days to seek to infer what the real problem is , so that when we clear it , we actually clear it , rather than just putting a bandaid on it . ”
This elides the fact that cases are a bandaid . Almost literally — it ’s a musical composition of material affix at top a goggle maw in the telephone set . There is a problem when people ’s skin total into contact with the weak spot on the earphone . On every unmarried iPhone 4 .
The Upshot
So ! There is a trouble with a particular decimal point on the iPhone 4 ’s external antenna . When you tinct that individual level with bare hide , you lose signal strength — around 24dB , to precise . The old method of exhibit signal bars did made it look bad , because of the way it compressed the dynamic range . The barren cases will help — importantly , allot to Anandtech ’s numbers , but it ’s not a permanent location . The huge legal age of the time , it does offer better reception .
Apple ’s done the right matter , for now , by fasten the iPhone ’s sign display , which might be the best of any smartphone — even if it ’s a lilliputian silly that this is what it took for that to happen . Andthe spare casesdo better the antenna trouble , even if they do n’t doctor its cause . Maybe , asJean - Louis Gassee suggested , it should ’ve been framed as a trade-off from the very beginning . Informed consumer , radical transparency , crisis averted . Everyone would ’ve babble out about how much they lie with their iPhone anyway from the very beginning .
https://gizmodo.com/apple-will-give-free-bumpers-to-iphone-4-owners-5589004
The iPhone 4 is a antic speech sound — among the best yet made — and the antenna result may indent its crown , but does n’t dethrone it .
Illustration : Nikki Cook
Daily Newsletter
Get the good technical school , science , and culture news in your inbox daily .
News from the time to come , surrender to your present .
You May Also Like
