Alex Garland ’s young movieEx Machinais a dark and sometimes disturbing look at robots , artificial word , and what it mean to be human . I talked with Garland about his childhood expectation for the future tense , why citizenry do n’t seem to care about the Snowden leaks , and whether Ray Kurzweil is full of shit . Ex Machina is in theaters everywherethis weekend .
picture : Director Alex Garland with Alicia Vikander , who plays the automaton Ava in the plastic film
When you were growing up , what did you imagine the twenty-first century would see like ?
Well , delimit the age that you ’re asking about . Like 10 or 15 ?
Say , the first two decades of your life . As you ’re sort of acquire ideas about what the year 2000 would look like . Was that a bench mark that you look toward ?
I guess it believably was in as much as I was born in 1970 and it was kind of drilled into us to expect a lot from 2000 or the year just after . So yeah , there was that sense of go toward the millennium and that being very relevant . What I think is that I was expecting a lot . And the area where I guess if you ’d break off me aged 20 and asked what was likely to be around , I ’d have been very wrong .
I think that broadly speaking , the expectations I would ’ve had back then were to do with stuff like medicine . Like all sort of diseases would be cure , and we ’d be living way way way longer , and we ’d have more car parting that were part of us . I think it would ’ve been all about length of service and health in some weird kind of way . And instead it end up being more like Dick Tracey , with petite computer that you’re able to deport around and fag out around your wrist .
Weirdly , sci - fi terminate up being closer to reality with some of this stuff and nonsense . It was more convenience related , I guess . And less seismic in some manner . Like people say the internet is seismal . And of course it is , it ’s fantastically important , and it ’s change a lot of paradigms and it ’s a big deal . But it ’s not as bad a deal as live to 200 or Crab being bring around . So it turned out to be more gadget concern and less fundamental than I think I ’d expect .
So would you say that you ’re let down by the future or was it simply an adjustment of expectation as you grow aged ?
It ’s an adaptation of prospect , definitely . And it ’s the agency these thing go , is n’t it ? You ’re unconvincing to be able to accurately predict this hooey . When I was a kid , there was this show on the BBC called Tomorrow ’s World . And Tomorrow ’s World was kind of a weekly show that would highlight the incredible things that were just on the horizon . You know , in five age , we ’re all going to have these robots that clean our car , or whatever the hell it was . And one of the thing about Tomorrow ’s World was that it was just unrelentingly wrong about everything . [ laughs ] So none of its predictions ever seemed to come true . So I gauge my bang pace was about the same as Tomorrow ’s World and I should n’t be surprised by that because I was given hebdomadary grounds of how these things play out .
Well , speaking of Tomorrow ’s World — which I ’m very familiar with because I write about retiring vision of the future and the history of technology , so I love that show , and it ’s fantastically incorrect , as you say [ laughs ] — what kinds of futurism did you produce up on ? Were there any robot or AI stories that stick out , that may have inhale any of your work ?
I was born in 1970 , so I grow up with the kind of paranoid sci - fi . Like everything was kind of defined by Watergate and Vietnam in some weird kind of path . The foe and narratives when I was growing up were governments and corporations typically . In my parent ’ coevals , the foe were other states , you roll in the hay , other countries . By the time I was growing up it was your own nation that was the enemy , or it was your ally , it was sort of capitalist corporations , that kind of thing . So Soylent Green and Westworld and Planet of the Apes , Logan ’s Run — those thing were paranoid flick and they tell us that we were our own worst enemy . And I guess I ’m a mathematical product of that in a way .
I ’ve noticed that it ’s flipped again . Typically the enemies these days are other states again , they ’re other countries . They ’re other intelligence services or they ’re terrorists and stuff like that . And multitude , to my idea as a sort of nipper of the seventy , experience slenderly too relaxed about governments and potbelly . I slimly find like the fact that the Snowden story did n’t get as much traction as it should ’ve gotten . It should ’ve been another Watergate , but it was n’t . And I think it ’s because people find less alarmed by bay window and governments these days than they used to .
Why do you think that might be ? Where does that come from ? Why would anyone be less alarmed these day ?
I do n’t know . I just do n’t know . I remember I ’m too old to sanely solicit into that stuff . I mean , I can speculate a minuscule bit . But it is a form of crap speculation , because I do n’t really recognize what I ’m talking about . But I have mark — like I play on PS4 and XBox Live and hooey like that , and I ’ve mark , like I ’m in my mid-40s but I might be act with someone who ’s like 20 — and those people are right smart less sort of instinctively protective of their identity element than I would be . And I inquire if it ’s because they ’ve grown up with social media , and they ’ve grow up with giving up a muckle of privacy in terms of Instagram or Twitter or whatever the fuck it is . And they ’ve never seen any drag through the mud consequence of that .
It ’s all pretty straight and it does n’t really impact their life in an contrary way , so what ’s to be paranoid about ? I opine . perhaps something like that . And sometimes I recollect possibly I am just out of touch and there really is nothing to be alarmed about with these things . I discover it perfectly reasonable that I might be out of touch , perhaps even probable because I am middle aged and that ’s what materialise . You get out of jot , I guess .
There ’s something that ’s been bothering me ever since I saw Ex Machina . In the hallway with the faces of golem , we see one that ’s 2nd from the right wing as you ’re facing them . And that automaton looks so conversant to me , like it ’s some older robot from the other twentieth century that I just ca n’t space . Was that case free-base on any automaton in particular ?
Are you talking about the one flat to the left wing of the Ava masque ?
Yes . [ Note : It ’s the one pictured above . ]
I ’m gon na have a pang at what that might be , and I really go for I ’m ripe because I know just the kind of thing you ’re describe and it ’s really plaguey [ laughs ] when that kind of thing happens . So I ’d enjoy to be able to nab it if I can . What it might be is the mask in Spirited Away .
Oh wow . I imagine that might be it ? Was that the stirring for that masquerade ?
No , but it did remind me of that . And I had possibly 20 mask I could choose from and I pulled that one out partly because it reminded me of that figure , because I ’ve make a petty fashion model of it at menage and Spirited Away is one of my favorite movies . I absolutely love that plastic film . And there was something in the sort of more or less vacuous aspect , and actually just the structure of the face that powerfully remind me of it . So maybe it ’s that .
The factual function of those masks was — there ’s an persona you ’d used to see in school textbooks , like of evolution — which would be a left to ripe illustration of an ape have more and more upright until it stop up as homo sapiens . I was sort of around hear to echo something like that , but with faces , going from very crude folk art to eventually Ava ’s face . So that ’s what I was retrieve of , but the reason I pull that fussy masquerade was the Spirited Away plastic film , I just love that celluloid .
Do you think you ’ll see inviolable AI achieved within in your lifetime ?
I think that if I was going to make a bet and it was for a peck of money , so I had to take it gravely , I would say no . I reckon that the Kurzweil prediction is too affirmative , if affirmative is the right word . Some masses would say pessimistic . I think that if it encounter it ’s more potential to be in my children ’s lifespan . There are some truly vast knottiness to machine being self - cognisant in the way that we appear to be self - mindful . And I also recall it feels like there is a very key big discovery that is yet to materialise , about the mode that thinking happens and about what thinking is . So I ’d guess slightly further abroad .
But listen , what the roll in the hay do I know ? I am just some guy wire who get interested in AI and cognizance and wrote a movie . That qualifies me for nothing . [ laughs ] If you do this as a Q&A , I think that ’s a fairly important caveat .
Of course , punctually noted . And that ’s novel for the great unwashed who have such an influence on the culture when it get along to futurism . Obviously as someone who canvass past vision of the futurity , I have a rather skeptical eye towards all futurism , but it ’s still interesting . And it certainly sort of throw off light on the creators of media and their mentality on the time to come …
To me a lot of spark gets give on the motivation of the people who are doing this material for material . Like if you mouth to those masses , the motivation are gripping … there ’s a full range , you know … anyway , I credibly should n’t say too much …
No , I ’d jazz to hear who you spoke with . If you address with any technologists or philosophers or citizenry who may have …
I spoke with a circumstances of people . The affair about this movie is that it ’s an ideas movie . And if the ideas are badly represented or just dumb , the movie falls down as far as I ’m concerned — it does n’t vindicate itself . And because I ’m a secular what I did was I write the script and then I submitted it to people who I know were working in this field or who had written account book that I had drawn from in writing the playscript .
And then I also got to meet other citizenry as a consequence of having made the film . So after the script , but in post - production or in screenings and stuff like that as interest grew . So I got to utter to quite a extensive range of the great unwashed . And people who are very mired in this area at a high grade . And the conversation have been fascinating . I ’ve encountered motivations where I think if you boil it down would come to a dictation for immortality — the ability possibly to download oneself and that ’s for real , hoi polloi do remember in those term .
One of the people I ’ve spoken to at expectant length is involved is ask in this stuff in a funny form of way , it ’s almost lost the way they ’re involved in it . Because they have such immense apprehension about what they ’re doing . And even enjoin that they cerebrate a circumstances about severalize their children maybe they should n’t have minor themselves because of some of the implications of what an AI - shaped future tense looks like . And that that time to come is quite material . Now , that person may or may not be right , but I get hold it fascinating that someone would continue to make for on something they felt up jeopardized their grandchildren in that way . But they do . And it mouth of the complex , motley motivations that are at romp with this stuff .
Can I ask what field that someone works in ?
Robotics . But robotics with a particular eye on cognitive — basically on strong AI , but strong AI as something which is then embodied and serve in the same environment that we function . So not a form of abstract cloud - like AI but a kind of in the real mankind , interactive form of AI .
If you were confronted with the quandary of saving a person ’s sprightliness or a strong AI ’s existence , and the person is icky and signify and the AI seems to have a strong moral orbit , which do you consider you ’d choose ? Do you call up you ’d ever …
I ’d choose the strong AI . I do n’t find that a very complicated thought experiment . Because what you ’re saying is take between the existence of two sentient creature , one of which is malign and the other one is benignant . Well , I ’ll choose the benignant one . If something is sentient and roughly approximate to us … Look , a frank is sentient . And if you rephrase the question with a dog and a man , I ’d say save the human . So I ’m simulate that you ’re talking about a level of sentience that is equivalent to us . A point of intelligence and sophistication .
But if I really believe that that thing is sentient , that it ’s ego - cognisant and it has an emotional spirit and as you said a moral ambit , and the moral range is aligned in the same way that mine is , and then you ’re saying , compare it to another sentient animal that has a moral compass , which is aligned in an paired direction , then it ’s a blinking no - brainer as far as I ’m concerned .
permit ’s say the human being is Pol Pot and the AI is Ava , as present in the film . Well , I ’ll opt Ava .
Fair enough .
What would you select ?
I really do n’t know . I frankly do n’t know . When I think about it , as you say with the hot dog rather of the golem , of line I ’m going to choose the human . I think your motion picture really points the finger at us . With all the mirrors , and this form of ego - reflexive thinking … but so the question becomes , is a automaton us ? Can we see ourselves in the robot ? And I do n’t know …
Yeah , but we do n’t need to see ourselves . One of the thing in the film is that I retrieve it suggests that Ava is in some respects not like us , but she does n’t need to be like us to have value .
Sure .
Can I ask you a thought experimentation ?
Yes , of class .
If the Ava that you ascertain in the moving-picture show was in a room with you now and she was followed shortly after with a bozo with a hammer who suppose , “ Ava is the only model in existence and she did everything you just saw in the motion picture and I believe the good matter to do is to smash her up . ” Would you stop that guy smashing her up or would you want to protect her ?
I think that I ’d need to protect her cosmos , but I do n’t know . This is why your moving-picture show is one of my favorites in a foresightful time . I do n’t have any of the resolution , and I do n’t do it what I ’d do in any of these scenario . I continue going back and forth after see the film . Would I have had any empathy ? Would I have been capable to sort out of divorcement myself from any feelings of empathy toward Ava ? I really do n’t know . Which is what ’s so unbelievably frustrating when it come up to these questions about what the future holds for 100 , 200 years , a thousand years down the line of credit — long after I ’m dead .
Yeah , both of us . [ laughs ] I think these are things we ’re going to have to contend with , would be my suspicion .
For trusted . One last question , are you generally optimistic or pessimistic about the time to come ?
I ’m definitely optimistic about the hereafter . I can imagine why it might seem like I ’m not , but for me , this film is actually a sorting of queerly affirmative film . At least from my point of position , it is . And loosely speaking , if I just step back and I look at the agency human beings has been developing … the thing that I measure the most I guess is human rights . And I think that broadly verbalize , human rights continue to make currentness . And I recall that ’s a good thing and I suppose that will probably persist in . So I ’d say I ’m affirmative . We are often pretty dumb , but in the tremendous sweep of thing , we ’re moving forwards , not backwards .
touch the author at[email protected ] .
Ex Machina
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , science , and polish news show in your inbox daily .
news program from the future , delivered to your present .
